Companies report that change control is a frequently mishandled part of their product management lifecycle. Indeed, a research study by the Aberdeen Group found that 85% of companies believed their change management procedures are either broken or could be improved.
But what are the tools and approaches you can adopt to make sure change control is serving your business effectively?
Having the ability to change plans, correct errors in design or otherwise optimise a product’s functioning, is essential for any company developing new products and managing an existing portfolio. It ensures money is not wasted on manufacturing designs that will not work or might malfunction; it protects companies from making investments in designs that are likely to fail.
After a product is launched, these controls should also ensure there is a formal way to capture and expedite changes resulting from customer feedback. This post launch capacity for change is an absolute requirement for some highly regulated sectors (such as medical device development, pharma and automotive), for whom CAPA (Corrective And Preventative Action) plans are evidence of a proactive and fit-for-purpose Quality Management System (QMS).
However, the ability to do all of the above effectively, really starts with having complete control over documentation from the outset of a project.
The most efficient and effective companies will have a digital Document Management System (DMS) in place to assemble, store and secure their plans and designs properly while making them accessible to an entire product team at every stage of a product lifecycle.
This DMS should be the foundation on which the whole product development process is built, and the place from which the entire change control mechanism is triggered, tracked and recorded.
The Aberdeen Group report found that the best performing companies were 70% more likely than their competitors to have a formal process in place for implementing engineering changes supported by digital tools.
This is an agreed way in which required changes are flagged and dealt with in a series of required steps. These typically include:
The ideal way to ensure this happens is by setting up workflows within a digital Document Management System. With the right DMS, the workflow can prompt email notifications for key stakeholders to review and comment on requested changes, before fresh technical documentation is issued for which approval is sought. Once digital approval has been gained from all parties, changes can be implemented, new issues of documents released, and records updated to show changes have been made.
Having these kind of document led processes in place ensures that important change requests are not ignored - that each one is evaluated properly and that any required change is correctly scoped, interpreted, implemented and then recorded.
A process like this, managed automatically via a digital platform can bring significant benefits to businesses who need to move quickly to satisfy customer demand and beat competitors to market.
It can end the bureaucratic nightmare of a change process with twenty or more steps, requiring numerous cross departmental meetings to reach agreement. It can eliminate all the wasteful actions involved in traditional change management without losing any of the necessary sense checks and reviews they were designed to offer.
The Aberdeen Group report also found that the better the quality of supporting documentation and data included in the change request, the better the commercial outcome of the request promises to be. The inclusion of CAD files, BOMs (Bill of Materials) and other detailed files within a CR makes it easier for a team to see the potential impact of the proposed change and judge whether or not to proceed.
Digitising this and other processes can make for much better informed teams and more seamless and efficient decision making. The Aberdeen Group report found that the most successful teams had centralised access to the entire change history of their product, including access to each individual change status and approval. With this kind of transparency businesses can make their teams more collaborative while reducing time-wasting and the duplication of effort.
Overall, the ABG group found that the best and most effective companies in the product development space were those who used software to manage engineering change which provided centralised design information, traceability across deliverables and management of the change workflow.
Informally managing engineering changes to products by email or in side-meetings between business managers and developers (although sometimes tempting) is clearly a recipe for chaos.
Instead, all the evidence shows that those taking a structured approach to change management, supported with the right digital tools can make for better decision making and implementations that really make a difference.
However, it’s vital that companies choose tools that won’t drive them to a halt through excessive bureaucracy and destroy the momentum of their product development processes.
Good engineering change control should be a function of a robust and simple DMS - a DMS designed to make governance of your entire product development cycle efficient, transparent and intuitive.